贾海龙：普通法方法练习案例5-MacphersonvBuickMotor.docx

想预览更多内容，点击预览全文
点击预览本文档（全文）

申明敬告：

本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己完全接受本站规则且自行承担所有风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载

文档介绍

■ MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.

L.R.A. 1916F, 696

N.Y. 1916.

L.R.A. 1916F, 696217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, Am.A nn. Cas. 1916C, 440

DONALD C. MACPHERSON, Resp on de nt,

v.

BUICK MOTOR COMPANY, Appella nt. Court of Appeals of New York.

Argued Jan uary 24, 1916. Decided March 14, 1916.

CARDOZO, J.

The defe ndant is a man ufacturer of automobiles. It sold an automobile to a retail dealer. The retail dealer resold to the plai ntiff. While the plai ntiff was in the car, it suddenly collapsed. He was *385 throw n out and in jured. One of the wheels was made of defective wood, and its spokes crumbled into fragments. The wheel was not made by the defendant; it was bought from ano ther man ufacturer. There is evidenee, however, that its defects could have bee n discovered by reas on able in specti

最近下载